Discussion on the opening of Ergneti market

The “People’s Party of the Republic of South Ossetia” opposes the re-opening of Ergneti market (closed by the Georgian authorities in 2004; before that a thriving trade place where thousands of Georgians and South Ossetians connected), which is currently being discussed in the media.

the old Ergneti market (photo: kavkasia.net)

the old Ergneti market (photo: kavkasia.net)

Basing their statement on the position of South Ossetia’s foreign ministry, which “has always been in favour of peaceful settlement of relations with neighbouring Georgia on an equal footing,” representatives of the party conclude that “This means that Georgia must first recognise South Ossetia’s independence and that only in this way relations between Georgia and South Ossetia will be normalised. ”

You can, of course, hang on to the principle of “recognition first, and everything else can follow “. But the chances of reaching any result with this approach are extremely small: in the current political environment, there is not even the slightest hint that recognition will actually take place, while other results, more modest but also more achievable in the near future, do not count and are not being pursued under this vision. In the meantime “relations on an equal basis” does not necessarily have to mean recognition when it comes to everyday, pragmatic issues, but can also be interpreted as equal participation in a given format (as happens e.g. in the Incident Prevention and Response Mechanism (IPRM)).

In its statement, the People’s Party further notes that “The presence of cheap goods and agricultural products will stagnate the development of local production. Trade relations with the Georgian side will place citizens of South Ossetia in a situation of financial dependence on Georgian traders“. One would be tempted to ask how to local production developed over the past 3 years of complete economic isolation from Georgia? Is really possible to think that tiny South Ossetia, with its limited resources, would economically be better off in isolation, that it can produce all necessary good all by itself? Trade is not only a connecting factor, but also a necessary component of any healthy economic system. And financial dependence will appear as much on the side of Georgian producers and traders as it will, possibly, on that of Ossetian buyers. But on the forefront of the debate I would like to place not interdependence (a completely healthy phenomenon between neighbours), but the development of mutually beneficial relationships!

agricultural produce (photo: RFERL Georgian service)

agricultural produce (photo: RFERL Georgian service)

(adaption of an entry in Russian on Caucasus Dialogues. See also the original comment and discussion (in Russian) on the Place for Peace discussion platform!)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s